Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Seems like a fair question for Hillary Clinton, and of course James Carville who immortalized these words

"If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."

      Considering recent frantic efforts by the DNC, and their bought and paid for media whores, to resurrect public outrage, if not simply casual interest, in alleged early-day-dalliances of Donald Trump, we believe our question is a fair one.

      Many of you may be too young to remember those brutal attacks leveled against any woman who dared mention the words Sex, and Bill Clinton in the same sentence.    

       Fortunately we certainly remember those days, and are mystified now when hearing reports from DNC news media, which apparently have arrived at some deformed epiphanous crossroad in their otherwise degenerate lives.

       This bastardized manifestation of shock and outrage is probably best illustrated in a pre-Presidential-election article appearing at the Chicago Tribune.  As reporter John Kass seems to indicate, (our words)--why should anyone care about Trump's past, and personal life now?

"If you're mystified about Trump and the death of outrage and lack of character evidenced in our national political actors, here's what you could do.

Find a dark room with a mirror. Bring with you a small lit candle. Stand before that mirror and spend three minutes in complete silence wondering about the death of outrage, then repeat after me:

"Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton."

If that doesn't work, try one of these: "It's only about sex," or "Everybody does it" or "It's a private matter."

Repeat until the words lose all meaning, becoming mere sounds, unintelligible, so they'll transport you to your safe meditative space.

If that doesn't work, there's one more. Repeat the following:

"If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."

Those immortal words belong to James Carville, the Clinton Democratic operative who — with Hillary's assent — set the tone on how the Clintons would treat women who dared accuse former President Clinton of sexual harassment.

And the woman Carville referred to was Paula Jones.

She wasn't fancy or rich, just a working woman sexually harassed by Bill when he was governor of Arkansas.

But she was denigrated by Clinton's top advisers as "trailer park" trash, as someone so craven she'd crawl on dirt for the cash to slander Bill.

She was telling the truth. It was a straightforward sexual harassment case. If Bill had been a private-sector CEO, he'd have been fired.

But Hillary and Bill fought back, using the "nuts and sluts strategy," denigrating Jones and others, including Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey and the intern Monica Lewinsky.

As part of all this, Bill Clinton, as president, lied under oath. He committed perjury.

Just consider the mental gymnastics it takes to excuse perjury in a sitting president. Consider the lack of character it takes to defend it. Consider the lack of foresight it takes to do this while avoiding the effect it could have on the republic.

Not only was sexual harasser and liar Bill Clinton defended, but he also was politically rehabilitated by many of the same actors, by feminists and by the Democratic insiders. And the damage was done.

Hillary and Bill and their meat puppets told us then that character didn't matter. It was all a private thing.

In essence, they helped give birth to Trump. You might say Hillary — protecting Bill to guard her own ambition — was midwife to the Trump campaign.

Because without a rehabilitated Bill Clinton there could never have been a Trump candidacy. Trump would not have been conceivable, let alone possible.

So if Hillary Clinton and her meat puppets wonder about what happened to character and outrage in politics, all they have to do is this:

Just look in the mirror.
And tell themselves the death of outrage is only a private matter." *

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are welcomed at this site, however content is subject to review when submission contains foul language or libelous/malicious remarks.