If they had accepted the final results following election day, everyone most likely would have simply hibernated for another four years, until the 2020 dog and pony show once again comes to a town near you. But now, because they refused to accept defeat by demanding recounts of votes, where Hillary thinks she might gain enough votes to turn the end results around, they are drawing attention and interest to recounts in places where obvious massive voting fraud allegedly took place--CALIFORNIA.
As highlighted a few days ago at this website, California's voter registration scam in that state must be investigated. Anyone applying for a driver's license can automatically be registered to vote in California. You do not have to be a documented American citizen to obtain a driver's license in that State, it is our understanding, anyone getting a driver's certification is also awarded a free pass to participate in this country's voting process. No voter fraud to see here.
Adding insult to injury for Hillary Clinton and her stooge, Jill....even the Green Party, which Stein supposedly represented in the run up to this election is breaking down it's tents, and leaving Hack and Hill to their dirty deeds.
According to the Daily Caller*
"The Green Party officially distanced itself from Stein’s dogged pursuit of voter fraud claims, noting that Stein blurred the lines between the Green Party and the Democratic Party by only selecting states that Clinton could benefit from if the results were reversed.
“The decision to pursue a recount was not made in a democratic or a strategic way, nor did it respect the established decision making processes and structures of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS),” the official press release asserts. “The recount has created confusion about the relationship between the Green and Democratic parties because the states chosen for the recount are only states in which Hillary Clinton lost. There were close races in other states such as New Hampshire and Minnesota where Clinton won, but which were not part of the recount. And this recount does not address the disenfranchisement of voters; it recounts votes that were already counted rather than restoring the suffrage of voters who were prevented from voting.”
The Democratic Party also appeared to distance itself from Stein’s decision, with top Clinton aides telling fundraisers that if they really want to help the Democratic cause, they should focus on 2018 races or the runoff in Louisiana.
“Believe me if there was anything I could do to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States I would,” former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, told the Associated Press. “But this is a big waste of time.”
Rather than facing extinction, and if they really had any desire to clean up this dirty voting scam, Democrats successfully pull off every two or four years, they would be demanding a complete rehab of the current corrupted system.
And there lies the dilemma for the old guard of this rapidly fading blue collar worker's party. They have turned their backs on the very people who have kept them relevant for way too many decades. Instead of focusing on the needs of these working class supporters, they concerned themselves more so with 'mentally ill men playing dress-up,' and tying up our judicial system, trying to decide if Junior's Johnson should be displayed with pride in your daughter's bathroom.
Election officials in California scoff at any suggestion of voter impropriety, while at the same time, knowingly nodding its approval of allowing multiple absentee ballots sent to fictitious residential addresses. Voter's rising from the dead. And countless ballots illegally cast by non-citizens. Therefore, if these same officials are amused by these suggestions of voter fraud, they should be first to endorse a process of matching votes to voters in their State. Look for something this bizarre happening in the 'year two-thousand-and-NEVER.'
* http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/30/judge-refuses-hand-recount-in-wisconsin-as-dems-back-away-from-steins-push/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcomed at this site, however content is subject to review when submission contains foul language or libelous/malicious remarks.