Tuesday, April 25, 2017

France....Berkeley, California...."I wouldn't go there"


"The world's 
most beautiful avenue" 


Clean up your "World's most
beautiful avenue, and 'The World'
will come rushing back
 to admire its beauty.

Until this happens.....


        You Tube:  Voidgangsta  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBYJwJRH5ug



Speaking as an American.....
Until the State of California
cleans up it's act, and no longer
insists on being a 
STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM

"I WOULDN'T GO TO
CALIFORNIA"


Berkeley, California
"Birthplace of free speech."





"I WOULDN'T GO THERE!"

Monday, April 10, 2017

Perhaps now....The United States Supreme Court has an 'adult figure' in the room

  







"Neil Gorsuch is exactly the kind of of
 Supreme Court Justice
 WE (the people) NEED" *


     Occasionally, we Americans ALL need a reminder that our unique form of government has endured throughout the years because it is grounded in principles and laws established by a comprehensive, and conclusive document...The Constitution of The United States of America. 

     Unfortunately, there are those among us (We the People) who sometimes emerge with a distorted interpretation of how those original founders penned these words with an everlasting meaning, allowing no future individual the option to rewrite this document to favor one faction over any other--everyone being governed as ONE.

     So when a current Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor had earlier in her career declared, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that live." she should have been disqualified from 'serving All the People' at the highest court of this land. Her words, according to both Constitutional scholars and average Americans, appeared to suggest a possible prejudice favoring one gender or group of individuals over a majority of others solely to demonstrate a miscarriage of the law based on personal compassion and feelings.

     According to Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley, "We've had too many judges ruling according to their personal views for too long. As Gorsuch himself recently put it, "judges should be in the business of declaring what the law is using the traditional tools of interpretation, rather than pronouncing the law as they might wish it to be in light of their own political views." That should go for conservatives and liberals alike." * 


     Hawley concludes, "The Constitution makes Americans who we are."  

     Our newest Supreme Court Judge Neil Gorsuch, laid out by his lifetime career of supporting the words set forth by our founding fathers, hopefully will be the Justice...we Americans need to "protect it."


Thursday, April 6, 2017

The Servant's Wealth--No additional pay for political bias against at least 1/2 of the U-S population

A majority of Mexifornians Californians
want this 84 year old Senator to call it quits....
Ostensibly concerned about giving another Liberal Democrat an opportunity to get filthy rich, while hard working taxpayers, labor to pay   that State's staggering debt.


     Unfortunately I cannot locate an audio clip of Senator Feinstein's actual words, but when hearing her say she could not morally support Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch's elevation to the high court I nearly drove off the highway.

     Is it really necessary to remind Feinstein....#1, identifying as a Liberal Democrat, coupled with representing 'Uber-Liberal-California'-YOU HAVE NO MORALS. And more importantly #2 -- YOU HAVE NO SOUL. Hiding behind your support for 'woman's rights' as justification for the slaughter of millions upon millions of babies, removes any claim to MORALS, OR SOUL.  But then, this is not for us to judge....so, you're 84? Interesting....TICK TOCK!

     Regarding Feinstein's Gorsuch comments;  The all-knowing octogenarian argued that Gorsuch’s answers during confirmation hearings were “so diluted with ambiguity” that he declined to express his views on whether longstanding landmark cases were justly decided.
Feinstein argued that in these decisions Gorsuch “went out of his way to apply his own view of the law,” echoing other Democrats who have faulted the nominee for what they claim was “selective activism.”

     Perhaps the 'seniorette' Senator's failing memory might account for not remembering...then Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor during her hearings when Republican critics sited her controversial comments which seemed to reflect more on feeling than Constitutional law, when arriving at a judicial decision. 

      Sotomayor said in a speech, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life," 

     Sotomayor went on to become a Supreme Court Justice, and today is serving as one of three women rubbing shoulder with 'the guys,' in that exclusive 'club.'

     Feinstein apparently is guilty of many shortcomings, but most notably is her ability to cherry pick when, and when not to apply equal standards for, in this instance, Supreme Court Justice nominees.  At this point in Feinstein's career, it probably is too late to remind her, the Supreme court Justices are lawfully obligated to judge cases solely on WHAT the Constitution says--NOT their feelings.

     One final interesting fact which screams hypocrisy on the backs of the ever-biased Democrats.  The last time Judge Gorsuch's name came under their scrutiny when he was nominated for the Tenth Circuit Court in 2006, NOT ONE DEMOCRAT SENATOR CURRENTLY OPPOSING GORSUCH (INCLUDING FEINSTEIN), ATTEMPTED TO BLOCK HIS APPOINTMENT. NOT AS MUCH AS EVEN A RECORDED VOTE.  A SIMPLE VOICE VOTE ELEVATED HIM TO THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT.

     The only noticeable change since 2006; Democrats have NO POWER.  And even on the eve of Judge Gorsuch's coronation, these fools are forcing Republican leadership to RETURN THE VOTING PROCESS TO A SIMPLE ONE VOTE MAJORITY TO ASSURE PASSAGE OF LEGISLATION FAVORED BY THE MAJORITY PARTY--REPUBLICANS.

     What this means is that the next vacancy on the Supreme Court will be a slam-dunk for the Republican Party, and most assuredly will guarantee for decades to come, a Conservative majority on the nation's highest court.

     SMART MOVE DEMOCRATS.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/326970-feinstein-announces-opposition-to-gorsuch